After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these systems. Via lie recognition tools tested at the border to a system for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being found in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to find the way these devices and to follow their legal right for safety.
It also illustrates how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They help the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering these people from opening the stations of proper protection. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who also are regimented by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double effect: her latest blog whilst they assistance to expedite the asylum procedure, they also produce it difficult to get refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.